The records below use the same programme catalogue as the checker. Dates are evaluated when this page is requested, not treated as proof of live funder availability. Check the official source before applying. National records apply only to their specified organisations.
Grant programme · National programme
Commonwealth Capital Grants Program
Ongoing route — authority confirmation required
Applications follow the relevant Block Grant Authority cycle; this is not a continuously open direct Commonwealth form.
Official programme facts: Eligible non-government primary and secondary schools seek capital assistance through their Block Grant Authority. Financial need and the wider project are assessed.
SiteComms interpretation: A PA, paging or intercom component may warrant a question to the BGA when it belongs to eligible construction or refurbishment. A standalone equipment purchase is not assumed to fit.
Material conditions and next action
- The guidelines generally exclude equipment and IT unless associated with capital works or accepted special circumstances.
- Pre-primary facilities and projects solely undertaken by parents’ associations are not this programme’s ordinary scope.
- School eligibility, tenure, available resources, contributions and the BGA timetable still require assessment.
Next step: Contact the BGA for the school’s state and sector before contracting. Describe the complete capital project and ask whether each communications line is eligible.
Grant programme · National programme
ACCAP: targeted aged-care capital programme
Programme watchlist — no general open round established
This is a programme-level watch route. Prior rounds and local targeted opportunities must not be treated as a new open national round.
Official programme facts: ACCAP supports targeted aged-care infrastructure, including facilities serving rural/remote locations and people with specialised access needs. Availability is opportunity-specific.
SiteComms interpretation: Communications infrastructure may form part of an eligible wider facility project. The overview does not establish that a standalone paging, PA or nurse-call purchase will be funded.
Material conditions and next action
- Residential aged care and retirement villages are different; retirement-village operation alone does not establish access.
- Check the particular opportunity’s provider, location, project and expenditure conditions.
- No current award, provider endorsement or application invitation is implied.
Next step: Review the department’s current ACCAP opportunities and obtain programme advice before preparing a grant application.
Grant programme · National programme
ACCAP Critical Infrastructure Projects — invitation only
Invitation only — not open to unsolicited applications
The Critical Infrastructure opportunity is invitation-only. Its 30 June 2030 end date does not make it open to unsolicited applications.
Official programme facts: The department describes Critical Infrastructure Projects as a closed, non-competitive, invitation-only opportunity, with an end date of 30 June 2030.
SiteComms interpretation: An urgent aged-care communications failure is not itself an invitation or eligibility decision. An invited provider must have the department confirm the proposal and expenditure scope.
Material conditions and next action
- An existing invitation, required provider status and the specific grant documents must be checked.
- No inference is made that every urgent safety or maintenance request qualifies.
- Full opportunity conditions require departmental confirmation; this record relies on the official programme overview.
Next step: An invited provider should use its departmental contact. Without an invitation, seek programme advice rather than treating this as an open application.
School-funded procurement — not new funding
WA public-school Direct to Market / departmental works
Ongoing route — authority confirmation required
A procurement mechanism for appropriately scoped school-funded work. It does not provide a grant or a school budget.
Official programme facts: WA publishes Direct to Market arrangements for eligible low-risk minor works/maintenance and departmental mechanisms for other work.
SiteComms interpretation: Before sourcing a communications contractor, the school must confirm the works category, current value limit, risk and the appropriate purchasing route.
Material conditions and next action
- Direct to Market does not establish available money or permission for every project.
- Broader building, electrical, network or higher-risk work may need a different departmental route.
- Do not split a project to fit a procurement threshold.
Next step: Ask the school’s authorised staff to confirm scope and procurement classification before requesting or accepting quotations.
Repayable loan — finance phase signpost
WA non-government-school Low Interest Loan Scheme
Ongoing route — authority confirmation required
A repayable capital loan with sector-specific application arrangements, not a grant. Detailed finance assessment is deferred.
Official programme facts: The state scheme assists eligible non-government-school capital development through a repayable loan arrangement.
SiteComms interpretation: A communications item would need to fit the eligible capital project and loan terms. The existence of the scheme is not finance approval.
Material conditions and next action
- Confirm the relevant sector application cycle and planned drawdown year.
- Repayment obligations and authorised borrowing must be reviewed separately.
- No interest rate, loan affordability, credit decision or approved amount is calculated here.
Next step: Contact the school’s sector/body and review the official scheme. Treat this as a finance-phase lead, not money awarded to the project.
Grant programme
Lotterywest community equipment / facilities pathway
Ongoing route — authority confirmation required
Contact Lotterywest to identify the right current opportunity and timing; this is not a blanket open equipment entitlement.
Official programme facts: Lotterywest supports eligible not-for-profit and local-government community projects, including appropriate equipment and capital facilities.
SiteComms interpretation: A communications improvement may be relevant where it delivers a demonstrable community outcome outside excluded core-service or private benefit.
Material conditions and next action
- Core government agency business, private benefit, ordinary operating support and retrospective costs have restrictions.
- Applicant/auspice eligibility, tenure, community outcomes and the proposed activity must be confirmed.
- A school or healthcare label alone is not evidence of eligibility for its normal infrastructure.
Next step: Discuss the community outcome, legal applicant and cost scope with Lotterywest before making commitments.